From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:27:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add git-archive-tree
Message-ID: <7vwt8mx8lb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <44F977C0.4060901@lsrfire.ath.cx>

Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:

> Currently git-archive-tree -f tar is slower than git-tar-tree.  This is
> because it is welded to the side of the existing code to minimize patch
> size, and I also suspect read_tree_recursive() to be quite a bit slower
> than builtin-tar-tree.c::traverse_tree().

Yes, I suspect "struct object" and friends are very inefficient
to use for things like this.  "struct tree_desc" based traverser
is much preferred.



-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.772588