From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:48:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase-i-p: only list commits that require rewriting in todo
Message-ID: <7vwsg1uqn1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081022000113.bacc1923.stephen@exigencecorp.com>

Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com> writes:

> Looks good--I applied this locally and it passes t3404, t3410, and
> t3411. Do I need to do anything else with this, e.g. resubmit/append on
> top of the previous series, or do you have it taken care of?

I've queued it on top of your series and merged the result in 'next'.
Further improvements should be done the same way.

> I will be bullish about the use cases I'd like to see work (these
> preserve merges tweaks and the config setting for `git pull`), but
> humble about my patches. This one especially is not elegant, it just
> passes the tests.

That's perfectly fine.  We can start from sound ideas (the behaviour we would want
to see) and incrementally improve the implementation.

Thanks.