From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:12:08 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Respect core.autocrlf when preparing temporary files for external diff Message-ID: <7vwsahb19z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Sebastian Schuberth writes: >> The discussion in the last few messages in this thread speculates that the >> external programs are more likely to expect representations suitable in >> the work tree, aka "smudged", than "clean" one.  It would be nice to get a >> datapoint from you as the original reporter to confirm or refute that >> speculation. > > I agree to the speculations. IMHO calling an external diff tool with > two revisions of a file should result in the same as e.g. checking out > the two revisions in two different working trees and then launching > the user's external diff tool on the two working tree files. Ok.