From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:37:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] No-op gettextize core Git C programs
Message-ID: <7vwrkra5un.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <7v1v2zbmn9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>   * Reverted back to using the "gettextize" patch subjects I
>>     originally used. I'm using these consistetly so I can later git
>>     log --grep=gettextize: to find them. I'd like to preserve that
>>     attributed.
>
> Can we make that shorter, perhaps just "i18n:"?  In this series, your
> first three and Jonathan's are oddballs that do not have "gettexize:"
> anyway.
>
> Will give it a whirl.  Thanks.

It was a slightly unpleasant experience to merge this round to 'pu' (after
excluding the earlier round from it, of course), as a few topics in flight
that reorganized existing functions into smaller helpers had to conflict
with this patch.  I tried to be careful but please double check the result,
perhaps with:

    $ git show --first-parent origin/pu

when it is propagated to mirrors.

Thanks.