From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:23:24 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] builtin/show.c: do not prune by pathspec Message-ID: <7vwrjfjdqr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4D948105.3050009@drmicha.warpmail.net> Michael J Gruber writes: >> Tests please? > > Heck, we don't have any to begin with, and this is marked RFC. Given our > usual reluctance to change even undocumented behavior I'm not going to > bother with tests for an RFC. Quite the contrary, a well written test is a concise and readable way to illustrate what behaviour the proposed change is making, and helps judging if it is going in a good direction. So if it is an RFC, a test would help very much, especially if there isn't any in the area currently.