From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 09:10:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] gitweb: Trying to improve history view speed
Message-ID: <7vvenxwglc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <edtuot$p76$2@sea.gmane.org>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
>> Shortlog:
>>  [PATCH 1/7] gitweb: Make pickaxe search a feature
>>  [PATCH 2/7] gitweb: Paginate history output
>>  [PATCH 3/7] gitweb: Use @hist_opts as git-rev-list parameters
>>              in git_history
>>  [PATCH 4/7] gitweb: Add parse_rev_list for later use
>>  [PATCH 5/7] gitweb: Use parse_rev_list in git_shortlog and git_history
>>  [PATCH 6/7] gitweb: Assume parsed revision list in git_shortlog_body
>>              and git_history_body
>>  [PATCH 7/7] gitweb: Set page to 0 if it is not defined, in git_history
>
> Should I resend corrected patch 1 (Make pickaxe search a feature; but
> default to on), and patches 2 and 7 as one patch (Paginate history output)?

I looked at and understood 1 and 2+7, although I cannot claim I
looked at 2+7 deeply enough; cursory look told me they should be
Ok.  So is 3, but I suspect gitweb without --full-history might
surprise some users.

I do not know about 4, 5 and 6.  I didn't look at them at all
the first time you sent them out, since I got an impression that
you did not understand how git-rev-list was supposed to work
when you did them.

Now Linus explained it to you, I suspect they would probably
need to be rethought?