From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 05:27:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] t0000: verify that real_path() works correctly with absolute paths
Message-ID: <7vvcfnsr3l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vfw6ru7de.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> (4) if it only runs once at the very beginning of the test and sets
> a variable that is named prominently clear what it means and lives
> throughout the test, then we do not even have to say "hopefully" and
> appear lazy and loose to the readers of the test who wonders what
> happens when the path does exist; doing so will help reducing the
> noise on the mailing list in the future.

Having said that, I really do not deeply care either way.  If you
are rerollilng the series for other changes, I wouldn't shed tears
even if I do not see any change to this part.