From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:35:00 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] rename: warn user when we have turned off rename detection Message-ID: <7vtzjq6gnv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20080301061431.GA27301@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Signed-off-by: Jeff King > --- > This was another patch from late in the freeze period. It was in > response to a user getting confused about why rename detection wasn't > happening in a large merge. Is it appropriate to print this for every > rename we try? Or should it just be for merges? > > Perhaps we should also bump the default limit from 100, which I think > was just arbitrarily chosen. > ... > + if ((num_create > rename_limit && num_src > rename_limit) || > + (num_create * num_src > rename_limit * rename_limit)) { > + warning("too many files, skipping inexact rename detection"); > goto cleanup; > + } > > mx = xmalloc(sizeof(*mx) * num_create * num_src); > for (dst_cnt = i = 0; i < rename_dst_nr; i++) { This reminds me of the 6d24ad9 (Optimize rename detection for a huge diff) topic that reduces the above allocation greatly. Some benching with the patch may prove useful to establish much higher limits, I suspect.