From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 23:01:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blame: can specify shas of commits to ignore on command line
Message-ID: <7vtyqnl19w.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <j2sfd211a421005041446ub9c2247ai484c2473df856b31@mail.gmail.com>

Dylan Reid <dgreid@gmail.com> writes:

> A null commit could work.  I think the behavior should be to not
> ignore the commit. Meaning if you specify a commit that introduced a
> line of code that line of code will still be blamed on the ignored
> commit.  Does That sound logical or is it too confusing?

I am already confused.  If the command must return C when you say "ignore
C" and C introduced a line you are interested in, then what is the point
of specifying commits to be ignored?