From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:01:44 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] push: old receive-pack does not understand --quiet Message-ID: <7vty8p8s8n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1315067656-2846-4-git-send-email-drizzd@aon.at> Clemens Buchacher writes: > Commit 90a6c7d4 (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack) > introduced the --quiet option to receive-pack and made send-pack > pass that option. Older versions of receive-pack do not recognize > the option, however, and terminate immediately. > > This change restores backwards compatibility by adding a 'quiet' > capability to receive-pack. Wouldn't this mean that there is no point in adding --quiet command line option to the receive-pack command? IOW, shouldn't parts of 90a6c7d (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack, 2011-07-30) be reverted? At this late stage in the release cycle, I would rather prefer to revert the whole commit and leave anything new for the next cycle.