From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:53:26 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] push: update remote tags only with force Message-ID: <7vtxqadrex.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130121234002.GE17156@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > ... The problem there is not "already exists" but rather > "a blob is not something that can fast-forward". Using the existing > REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD is insufficient (because later code will recommend > pull-then-push, which is wrong). So I'd be in favor of creating a new > error status for it. Very well said. Please make it so ;-) or should I?