From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:29:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] commit-slab: avoid large realloc
Message-ID: <7vtxn84m4a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130414191947.GB4599@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Yes, but isn't that a constant:
>
>   (512*1024-32) / sizeof(struct commit_slab_piece)
>
> Leaving it as such lets the compiler optimize better, and is safe from
> anybody changing it at runtime. But I think the answer to my question is
> "yes, that would be the best thing for patch 2, but patch 3 will allow a
> run-time stride parameter anyway". Correct?

Yup.