From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:02:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-seek: Eliminate spurious warning. Fix errant reference to git-bisect in docs.
Message-ID: <7vslq9fg53.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <87vev5r2m4.wl%cworth@cworth.org>

Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:

>> I wonder if its a good idea to silently reset a branch named with a
>> short common word?
>
> It at least takes some care not to leave commits dangling when doing
> this, (the seek branch must at least be a subset of the current
> HEAD). I was pretty much following the lead of git-bisect here,
> (though "bisect" is definitely a touch longer and less common than
> "seek").

IIUC Cogito seems to use cg-seek-point or something long and
unusual like that...