From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:05:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sha1_object_info(): be consistent with read_sha1_file()
Message-ID: <7vslg4crd5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0611280016150.30004@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> We used to try loose objects first with sha1_object_info(), but packed
> objects first with read_sha1_file(). Now, prefer packed objects over loose
> ones with sha1_object_info(), too.

Well caught.  It appears this inconsistent order was from the
day one when we started using the packed git, and I forgot to
swap them when I did ab90ea5 to swap the reading side.

Thanks.