From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:09:42 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Yet another builtin-fetch round Message-ID: <7vsl59ly7d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <7v6426m110.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano writes: > Daniel Barkalow writes: > >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: >> >>> Another short series for db/fetch-pack, still in pu. Aside from >>> optimizing the pipeline on the native transport (so we only invoke >>> the remote process we need once vs. twice) I'm actually now quite >>> comfortable with this whole series and think it is ready for next. >> >> While it's still in pu, should these series of corrections be amended into >> the original series (for the ones that correct new code)? Most of the >> before-fixing states aren't worth saving as project history. > > Yeah, I was wondering if that is a sane thing to do. It is > merely additional work to arrive at the same tree state, but > might be a good investment in the longer term. Heh, I did not realize that they are now all part of 'next' so that's moot.