From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:00:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] completion: rename _git and _gitk
Message-ID: <7vsjes3xl9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120522082406.GA6001@goldbirke>

SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:

>> -_git ()
>> +_main_git ()
>
>> -_gitk ()
>> +_main_gitk ()
>
> After all those namespace discussions the names of these functions
> should start with _git or __git.

As these are pure implementation internal details that are called from
very limited places, I do not think Felipe minds a patch to update them.

Personally I would find _git_git or __git_git even more mysterious and
begs one-liner comments above their definition, though.

Thanks.