From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:39:29 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2013, #03; Wed, 6)
Message-ID: <7vsj59b5am.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <5112AE34.6080107@web.de>

Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:

> Am 06.02.2013 19:29, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * jl/submodule-deinit (2013-02-04) 1 commit
>>  - submodule: add 'deinit' command
>> 
>>  There was no Porcelain way to say "I no longer am interested in
>>  this submodule", once you express your interest in a submodule with
>>  "submodule init".  "submodule deinit" is the way to do so.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'.
>
> Oops, I though you were waiting for a reroll. Currently I'm having the
> appended interdiff compared to your version. Changes are:
>
> - Add deinit to the --force documentation of "git submodule"
> - Never remove submodules containing a .git dir, even when forced
> - diagnostic output when "rm -rf" or "mkdir" fails
> - More test cases
>
> And I wanted to add three more test cases for modified submodules before
> sending v4. You could squash in the first two hunks into the commit you
> have in pu and I'll send a follow up patch with the extra tests soon or
> you could wait for me sending an updated patch. What do you think?

I haven't merged it down to 'next' yet.  So please proceed as you
planned.  Thanks for stopping me.