From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:24:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] "sleep 1" sleeps too little on cygwin Message-ID: <7vr774dqjo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <81b0412b0601190701g2696b1a9l14f3d288875e11ab@mail.gmail.com> Alex Riesen writes: > Works if sleep is for 2 secs (I completely forgot about that stupid > FAT granularity!) > st_ino is always the same (it is a hash of pathname). > Christopher, how is that supposed to work with hardlinks? (NTFS has > hardlinks, BTW) So the verdict is to take your patch but wait for three seconds? I still have mild aversion about $SECONDS though...