From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 01:26:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Subproject clones
Message-ID: <7vr6pm7ry4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070512011600.GA24354@us.ibm.com>

apw@us.ibm.com (Amos Waterland) writes:

> Is this intentional?  Shouldn't clone get the entire superproject?

Yes.  As 1.5.2 draft release notes and my response to somebody
else last night mentioned, the plumbing level subproject support
does _NOT_ recurse into subproject and this is deliberate.