From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:09:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT_UNKNOWN: do not fully trust existence of DT_UNKNOWN
Message-ID: <7vpsmmt32x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060120215314.GA4203@steel.home>

Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:

>> +#undef DT_UNKNOWN
>> +#undef DT_DIR
>> +#undef DT_REG
>> +#undef DT_LNK
>
> yes, of course

That is technically correct but I suspect it would not matter in
practice.  The only thing you are avoiding is four compiler
warnings when compiling for Cygwin of this week (I heard this is
already fixed in Cygwin CVS).  On older Cygwin you simply would
not use NO_D_TYPE_IN_DIRENT, since d_type worked before.  No?