From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:33:56 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Message-ID: <7vpre5anaz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200905182355.21645.johan@herland.net> Johan Herland writes: > After some thinking, I don't like my original name submodule..resolve, > since ".resolve" sounds more like a merge strategy or conflict resolution > method, than a "how to deal with submodule update" choice. I propose > submodule..update instead. Sounds like a plan, even though I do not necessarily agree with the idea of automatically rebinding what is at the submodule path every time you update the toplevel project tree. And from my point of view, "rebind" (or "autorebind") would be more appropriate name than "update" (and I would probably set it to "never").