From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:48:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] daemon: return "access denied" if a service is not allowed
Message-ID: <7vpqhzxpsc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111014203438.GA15643@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

>> It would have been a better split to have the 1/2 patch to support both
>> informative and uninformative errors, with the default to say "access
>> denied", and 2/2 to flip the default to be more open.
>
> Isn't that what I did? It was what I meant to do, anyway...
>
> Or did you mean the options would have been better worded as:
>
>   --errors={terse,informative}
>
> or something similar?

Nothing that elaborate.

Supporting --no-* variant even when the default is already no will allow
people to prepare their daemon invocation command line beforehand to ensure
that they won't be affected to a more lenient default that may or may not
come in the future.  That's all.