From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:39:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs
Message-ID: <7vpq7qtpas.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120720150726.GA2862@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I noticed I ignored the "discover" and "delete" parts of your paragraph.
> As far as deletion goes, I think we can ignore it; expiring all entries
> is equivalent.
> ...
> In other words, I want to focus on getting the ref-level plumbing right,
> and then we can care about the porcelain later.

Yeah, I agree that is a reasonable way forward.  for-each-ref with a
new option (--include-dead or something) can wait.