From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:40 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] format-patch: give --reroll-count a short synonym -v Message-ID: <7vpq1lvmtz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: "Philip Oakley" writes: >> +test_expect_success 'reroll count (-v)' ' >> + rm -fr patches && >> + git format-patch -o patches --cover-letter -v 4 master..side >list >> && > > Shouldn't this be using the sticked form -v4 as described in the > commit message and gitcli? I personally do not care too deeply either way. Both styles seem to work, and if/when we break parse-options API implementation, this test will break and we will notice, which might be an added plus ;-)