From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:04:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: forbid --bare --separate-git-dir <dir>
Message-ID: <7vpq1hlpeb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8A6soMEJ3FXY8MyeERAGN483M2UjqRS4muzzD6uj1QWow@mail.gmail.com>

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> I don't know what would go in the <explanation here> blank above,
>>> though.  Is it possible that some people are relying on this option
>>> combination?
>>
>> I do not necessarily think we must say "it happens not to work
>> already for such and such reasons, lucky us!", but it is indeed a
>> good idea to think things through, justifying why this cannot be a
>> regression, and record the fact that we did that thinking, in the
>> log message.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I wanted to give a day or two or think about the <explanation here>.
> Does "Thanks." mean you have picked up the patch and adjusted the
> commit message appropriately, or should I go with my original plan and
> resend it later with "explanantion there"?

The latter, "Thanks for a review".  I may have picked it up in 'pu',
but that merely means, as usual, that I wanted to add a reminder in
What's cooking to expect a reroll, and nothing more.

Thanks.