From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:43:35 GMT
Subject: Re: Following renames
Message-ID: <7vodzsq12g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060326223154.GU18185@pasky.or.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

>> No, it's the expected output just because you expected merges to always 
>> show up. Merges get ignored if any of the parents have the same content 
>> already.
>
> Eek. Can I avoid that? What was the reason for choosing this behavior?

Perhaps rev-list --sparse?