From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:58:17 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/n] gitweb: Better git-unquoting and gitweb-quoting of pathnames
Message-ID: <7vodro91ye.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <200611031159.02065.jnareb@gmail.com>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Perhaps it should be "LF ('\n') and TAB ('\t')".

Official terminology seems to call \t "HT", but my feeling is
that we would not need that comment there.

> Or
> 	return $es{$seq} if exists $es{$seq};

Although gitweb is full of that syntax, I personally do not like
it very much.  It is really hard to read when you are trying to
skim through the code quickly.  You would have to say "why
return it?  ah -- only when it exists, then it makes sense",
which is a hiccup that disrupts the thought process.