From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:18:40 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Documentation: Two more git-rebase --onto examples Message-ID: <7vodrkcrjj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <87zmb4v3vu.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Carl Worth writes: > I think Jakub's explanations do a much better job of explaining > something someone might actually want to do and then showing how to do > it. So if there's redundancy I'd vote for dropping the old stuff. I agree with that. > Meanwhile, while we're talking about git-rebase documentation, the > recent posts about the: > > git rebase --onto > > form take advantage of the fact that this command also changes the > current branch to . I think that's quite surprising behavior, > (though useful in the example that was given). It's perhaps out of > line with the scope of git-rebase but it should at least be > documented. I think that will need some specific mention before the > examples. Good point.