From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:23:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bisect: fix calculation of the number of suspicious revisions
Message-ID: <7vodmmz3wy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070321210454.GA2844@lala>

Uwe Kleine-König  <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> writes:

> Up to now the number printed was calculated assuming that the
> current revision to test is bad.  Given that it's not possible
> that this always matches the number of suspicious revs if the
> current one is good, the maximum of both is taken now.
>
> Moreover I think the number printed was always one to high,
> this is fixed, too.

I know you mean well, but is it really worth an extra rev-list
for this off-by-one, I wonder?