From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:42:10 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck --lost-found: write blob's contents, not their SHA-1 Message-ID: <7vodi4qfnx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > When looking for a lost blob, it is much nicer to be able to grep > through .git/lost-found/other/* than to write an inefficient loop > over the file names. So write the contents of the dangling blobs, > not their object names. I think this is an idea to solve a good problem, but if we go this route, the need for us to worry about expiring lost-found entries would become more urgent, I suspect. And when you think about expiring lost-found entries, another possible solution emerges. If we teach git-prune to remove the corresponding entry from lost-found/other when it removes a loose blob from the object store, then we can easily and safely do this instead: $ cat .git/lost-found/other/* | xargs -r git grep 'the word to look for'