From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:49:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 next 0/4] format-patch --cover-letter --in-reply-to Message-ID: <7vocwu1knq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Thomas Rast writes: > I also noticed that there is a textual conflict with 0db5260 (Enable > setting attach as the default in .gitconfig for git-format-patch., > 2009-02-12), which is already in 'next'. So I rebased the series to > 'next'. In general I'd rather not to see a series based on 'next' merely for a textual dependency like this (it is a different matter if your patch semantically depends on somebody else's work in 'next'). Your own topic will fork from 'master' and it will not want to be taken hostage of "attach as default" series.