From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:29:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] git apply: option to ignore whitespace differences
Message-ID: <7vocs36irw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <cb7bb73a0907021046x7fcb921bs86d55b69de540c9d@mail.gmail.com>

Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
>>> index dc0ff5e..86860d6 100644
>>> --- a/builtin-apply.c
>>> +++ b/builtin-apply.c
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static int diffstat;
>>>  static int numstat;
>>>  static int summary;
>>>  static int check;
>>> +static int ignore_whitespace = 0;
>>
>> s/ = 0//;
>
> Ah, I wondered about that. I assume this leaves no possibility for
> uninitialized values because of the way option parsing is done?

It is not "uninitialized" to begin with.

C initializes static variables without explicit initial values to 0.