From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:26:28 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Document the HTTP transport protocol Message-ID: <7vochwijaz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Scott Chacon writes: > I understand, it wasn't meant as a criticism, I was just curious why > this file was never included.  That the series was marked as RFC makes > sense.  Could I request that this one patch be included?  Or if Shawn > has a more recent one? I also understand and I didn't mean to sound as if I took offense. I very much appreciate reminders like yours of old discussions and patches that were basically good but did not reach conclusion at the end to avoid wasted effort. A pointer is good, but if you are reviving an old patch, it would be much easier if you did a resend/forward for people to comment in-line, by the way.