From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:11:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default
Message-ID: <7vobs1u7dr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <vpq1uoyx9zh.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:

> Just to be clear: I'm not saying that your workflow is wrong, but my
> feeling is that you wouldn't be hurt by 'push.default=upstream'. The
> area of potential improvement for your case would be at branch creation
> time more than at push time.

Your analysis of Stefan's pain points sounds very sensible.
The autoSetupMerge mechanism may want to learn new tricks, but that
is a separate issue and it shouldn't affect the search for a sane
default for push.