From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:16:48 GMT Subject: Re: [RFH] Merge driver Message-ID: <7vmzmi9ebj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20050912210813.GA6644@c165.ib.student.liu.se> Fredrik Kuivinen writes: > git-read-tree A > git-update-cache --refresh > git-read-tree -u -m T A B > > We need the second step because otherwise git-read-tree will complain > that the cache isn't uptodate. But we _know_ that the contents are > uptodate, so the second step is unnecessary and just eats time. If we _know_ it should match, isn't there a way to tell the first "git-read-tree A" not to mess with the dirtiness, like, ah, one-way merge?