From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:04:44 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] parse-opt: migrate builtin-ls-files. Message-ID: <7vmycoss2r.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20090214121631.GG4371@genesis.frugalware.org> Miklos Vajna writes: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Miklos Vajna writes: >> >> > Was this dropped on the floor by accident? >> >> I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was >> somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the >> one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug. >> >> Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user >> friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence >> it has been backburnered. It still is kept in my Inbox. > > I'm just asking again as I see the parseopt patch for builtin-config now > on the list. > > Should I just resend this patch after v1.6.2? You can do it either way, and a resend after v1.6.2 is certainly appreciated, As I said earlier in "What's cooking", 'pu' and 'next' are open during this freeze cycle as an experiment. I limit my bandwidth for handing anything non-fix during the rc freeze period as always. The only difference from previous cycles is that the cap used to be set to near-absolute-zero, but in this cycle it is not. It still is capped and updates to 'pu' and 'next' are "as time permits" basis.