From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 22:46:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] t/send-email.sh: add test for suppress self
Message-ID: <7vmwrdqu9f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130529214403.GA5956@redhat.com>

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:

>> > +test_suppress_self () {
>> > +		test_commit $3 &&
>> > +		test_when_finished "git reset --hard HEAD^" &&
>> > +		{
>> > +			echo "#!$SHELL_PATH"
>> > +			echo sed -n -e s/^cccmd--//p \"\$1\"
>> > +		} > cccmd-sed &&
>> > +		chmod +x cccmd-sed &&
>> 
>> We can use write_script for this kind of thing, I think.
>
> Important?
> It's open-coded elsewhere in this test.

Not that important, other than that it is nice not to spread what
the old tests did before write_script was introduced to new ones, as
that is one more thing to update when somebody feels like it.

> If we don't want to use \, this can also be done like this:
>
> FOO << EOF && 
> BLABLA
> EOF
>  BAR && 
>  VAR
>
> I think this is what you suggest.

Yup, that is exactly what I meant (but no leading indentation before
BAR and VAR).

That way, it is a lot more clear where the input is (the BLABLA is
fed to FOO and BAR and VAR do not have anything to do with it).

>> > +		grep '^Cc:' msghdr1-$3 > actual-no-cc-$3 && \
>> > +		test_cmp expected-no-cc-$3 actual-no-cc-$3

OK, so this is where the message begins, with the commit title "test
supress-cc.self...".

>> > +test suppress-cc.self $3 with name $1 email $2
>> > +
>> > +$3
>> > +
>> > +cccmd--"$1" <$2>
>> > +
>> > +Cc: "$1" <$2>
>> > +Cc: $1 <$2>
>> > +Signed-off-by: "$1" <$2>
>> > +Signed-off-by: $1 <$2>
>> > +EOF
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +test_expect_success $PREREQ 'self name is suppressed' "
>> > +	test_suppress_self 'A U Thor' 'author@redhat.com' 'self_name_suppressed'
>> > +"
>> > +
>> >  test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Show all headers' '
>> >  	git send-email \
>> >  		--dry-run \