From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:53:45 GMT Subject: Re: [RFD] Making "git push [--force/--delete]" safer? Message-ID: <7vmwq3e7xy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <51D413BA.6080709@viscovery.net> Johannes Sixt writes: > I don't think that is necessary. We already have *two* options to > force-push a ref: the + in front of refspec, and --force. They mean exactly the same thing; the only difference being that "+" prefix is per target ref, while "--force" covers everything, acting as a mere short-hand to add "+" to everything you push. If the "--lockref/--update-only-if-ref-is-still-there" option defeats "--force", it should defeat "+src:dst" exactly the same way.