From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:39:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Completion: Hint whether amend is the right thing to do.
Message-ID: <7vlk1urob4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200805290133.48490.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>

Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> writes:

> onsdagen den 28 maj 2008 17.53.40 skrev Junio C Hamano:
>> Does this mean that it would help reduce mistakes if "git commit --amend"
>> noticed the presense of .dotest-merge but absense of .dotest-merge/amend
>> and refused to operate, I have to wonder?
>
> Well I found myself making these mistakes. That would probably be better. 
> Shouldn't one block commit without amend too then?

If you mean to forbid "git commit" during rebase (perhaps interrupted by
s/pick/edit/), I do not think that would fly -- it is the advertised way
to split a commit into two, if I am not mistaken.