From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:53:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] git-web--browse: don't add start as candidate on Ubuntu
Message-ID: <7vljtr33sb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200901040833.25849.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>

Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:

> Le jeudi 1 janvier 2009, Ramsay Jones a écrit :
> ...
>> Does anybody else see this issue and can someone test the patch?
>
> Petr, as you added support for using /bin/start on MinGW, could you test?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.

> diff --git a/git-web--browse.sh b/git-web--browse.sh
> index 78d236b..7ed0fad 100755
> --- a/git-web--browse.sh
> +++ b/git-web--browse.sh
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ if test -z "$browser" ; then
>  	browser_candidates="open $browser_candidates"
>      fi
>      # /bin/start indicates MinGW
> -    if test -n /bin/start; then
> +    if test -x /bin/start; then
>  	browser_candidates="start $browser_candidates"
>      fi

In any case, the original test is simply bogus.  'test -n "$foo"' is to
see if $foo is an empty string, and giving a constant /bin/start always
yields true.

As an old timer, I tend to prefer "test -f" in this context, as anybody
sane can expect that the directory /bin will contain executables and
nothing else.  Another reason is purely stylistic.  Historically "-f" has
been much more portable than "-x" (which came from SVID), even though it
wouldn't make much difference in practice in the real world these days.