From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:42:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says
Message-ID: <7vliymfp4t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110504073850.GA8512@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> ... but I worry about compatibility. We can audit our in-tree scripts,
> but git-sh-setup is part of the recommended API for external scripts,
> no?

I am Ok with renaming the thing to "require_work_tree_exists", and all the
worry will go away.