From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:50:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] GITWEB - Load Checking
Message-ID: <7vk4wu6x6a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B21AC4D.2020407@kernel.org>

"J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org> writes:

> It was intended to be the most minimal possible, mainly get in, get
> out. Also not sure the die_error existed in gitweb when this was
> originally written.  Probably worth switching to it now since it's
> there either way, and I don't think using it would add enough overhead
> to matter.

Thanks; all sounded a reasonable response to the review.  Are you
re-rolling the series anytime soon (I am asking because then I'd rather
not to queue this round especially because I didn't see 5/6).