From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:19:33 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2011, #04; Sun, 8) Message-ID: <7vk4dql7oq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Ciaran writes: >> * jn/gitweb-js (2011-04-28) 13 commits >>  - gitweb: Make JavaScript ability to adjust timezones configurable >>  - gitweb.js: Add UI for selecting common timezone to display dates >>  - gitweb: JavaScript ability to adjust time based on timezone >>  - gitweb: Unify the way long timestamp is displayed >>  - gitweb: Refactor generating of long dates into format_timestamp_html >>  - gitweb.js: Provide getElementsByClassName method (if it not exists) >>  - gitweb.js: Introduce code to handle cookies from JavaScript >>  - gitweb.js: Extract and improve datetime handling >>  - gitweb.js: Provide default values for padding in padLeftStr and padLeft >>  - gitweb.js: Update and improve comments in JavaScript files >>  - gitweb: Split JavaScript for maintability, combining on build >>  - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile >>  - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb > > Sorry if this is dumb, as I'm unsure how Git (the mailing list) > handles regression tracking, but I saw no mention of this thread: > http://marc.info/?l=git&m=130445013906259&w=2 I did not recall any regression in gitweb JavaScript support topic reported, so I was puzzled about the above quote. I am aware of an issue around the merge-recursive area reported by you on May 3rd (Message-ID: , $gmane/172617) [*1*]. I had an impression that the guilty party pointed at by the bisection was already looking into it. Elijah, any progress on that one? [Footnote] *1* This is just my preference but I'd be happier if you gave the Message-Id of the message; it would be easier to find the thread. A reference to marc.info to me means an extra "launch browser only to look at it" and tends to be backburnered when I am busy (and I usually am).