From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:40:26 GMT Subject: Re: Local clone checks out wrong branch based on remote HEAD Message-ID: <7viqm7pvkl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Daniel Barkalow writes: > ... I think there's also been discussion of a > protocol extension to transmit the information, although I don't know > where that ended up. You can find them in the list of threads posted nearby. The first round's protocol extension was not quite backward compatible but in a benign way, in that it did not break anything but induced a harmless warning from older ls-remote. The second round did not have such flaw but it got a "Yuck". From: Jeff King Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:44:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20081201174414.GA22185@coredump.intra.peff.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 (v2)] upload-pack: send the HEAD information I somehow feel that the "Yuck" was addressed not to the patches but to the problem the patch needs to address. We could resurrect it if somebody is interested.