From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:05:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] blame: introduce $ as "end of file" in -L syntax
Message-ID: <7vip4v475o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <87wqtbivms.fsf@pctrast.inf.ethz.ch>

Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:

>> Even though I am moving from builtin/blame.c to line-log.c?  I would
>> otherwise have to call from a rather lib-ish file into a "front
>
> You haven't sent any reply to this.  Does that mean you agree?  Would
> you prefer the shared file to be named something like line-range.c?

The latter, or if you do not want a churn, not moving it out of
blame.c at all.

Because "log -L" does not play well with other patch options, from
the end-user's perspective, even though may does not have cmd_logL()
entry point, I do not think line-log.c is any more library-ish than
cmd_log() or cmd_blame().