From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:49:08 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixing volatile HEAD in push.default = current Message-ID: <7vip29hhuj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > I would argue that there is something to "fix", but that fix involves > making the cp a purely atomic operation which is super-complicated, > and totally not worth it. Would you _not_ like the above example to > work? No. I do not think I like the above example to "work", at all. I know we live in the real world, and I do not want to see such serializing implementations of cp or rm that try to "fix", as it will interfere my everyday use where such a race does not matter.