From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:03:14 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)
Message-ID: <7vhcasdnel.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <487BDF57.4090900@gmail.com>

Lea Wiemann <lewiemann@gmail.com> writes:

> Lea Wiemann wrote:
>> It'll be fixed in the next version I post
>
> By the way Junio, how do you prefer to get reposts of patch sequences?
> Should I repost the whole sequence under a new common parent message, or
> can I simply post v2 of each patch in the sequence as a followup to its
> respective v1?

I do not have major preference either way, but for a long series, I'd
prefer a resend to be independent from the previous series, i.e.

        [PATCH 0/3]
        .[PATCH 1/3]
        ..[PATCH 2/3]
        ...[PATCH 3/3]

        [PATCH 0/4 v2]
        .[PATCH 1/4 v2]
        ..[PATCH 2/4 v2]
        ...[PATCH 3/4 v2]
        ....[PATCH 4/4 v2]
        
I can live with the first one from the new series being a follow-up to the
first one from the old series, i.e.:

        [PATCH 0/3]
        .[PATCH 1/3]
        ..[PATCH 2/3]
        ...[PATCH 3/3]
        .[PATCH 0/4 v2]
        ..[PATCH 1/4 v2]
        ...[PATCH 2/4 v2]
        ....[PATCH 3/4 v2]
        .....[PATCH 4/4 v2]

but _not_ with this, i.e. N/M being followup to old N/M:

        [PATCH 0/3]
        .[PATCH 0/4 v2]
        .[PATCH 1/3]
        ..[PATCH 1/4 v2]
        ..[PATCH 2/3]
        ...[PATCH 2/4 v2]
        ...[PATCH 3/3]
        ....[PATCH 3/4 v2]
        .....[PATCH 4/4 v2]