From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:45:30 GMT Subject: Re: Are more and more patches getting lost lately? Message-ID: <7vhc8w5mfp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <7bfdc29a0809040130u21d43a22ncf2e481eefd9ff89@mail.gmail.com> "Imran M Yousuf" writes: > I actually liked the following 2 patch and since it was Junio I did > not think support was required :-D. > ... >> From: Junio C Hamano >> Subject: [PATCH/RFC] feeding Maildir to git-am >> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:25:57 -0700 >> Message-ID: <7vbpzotfyy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/92963 >> >> From: Junio C Hamano >> Subject: Re* [PATCH] git-apply - Add --include=PATH >> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:05:31 -0700 >> Message-ID: <7vhc99h644.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/93604 I think for most of these patches, and other patches from me of the same nature, I tried to make it clear that the patches were primarily to illustrate possibly better solutions, and I do not consider them finished solutions. The quality of these patches from me do not meet my patch acceptance criteria. More importantly I wasn't the one with the itch. Onus of testing them, polishing them as necessary and providing documentation into the final applicable patch lie on the original requestors' shoulders. Especially when I am busy.