From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:53:11 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] nd/clone-detached
Message-ID: <7vhazyyduw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8DggQdM1aoeL+u=3Wz+5f7hi4eG=6MHXPCJZ6pOmhQJ_w@mail.gmail.com>

Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> 2012/1/14 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
>> Thanks, replaced (and updated comment strings read much better).
>>
>> There were some conlicts I had to resolve while merging this to 'pu'.
>> I would appreciate it if you can eyeball it to make sure I didn't make
>> silly mistakes there.
>
> Right, the conflict with nd/clone-single-branch. I kept thinking there
> would not be conflict because clone-single-branch's big change was in
> wanted_peer_refs() and missed write_followtags() call. The merge looks
> good.

Hmm, 'pu' seems to fail its selftest with this merge present, though.