From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:53:49 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] name-rev: --weight option (WIP) Message-ID: <7vharlujaq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20120830033611.GA32268@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > I wonder if you can > define the weight as a recursive function of the parents. I do not think we can. A merge Z between X (that has N commits behind it) and Y (that has M commits behind it) has at most N+M+1 commits behind it (counting itself), but we cannot tell how many among these N and M are shared. > That would double-count "A" and "B" in this example. But maybe there is > a clever way to define it that avoids that. We've dealt with this issue long time ago when we optimized the bisection count, which involves exactly the same issue.